increases in recent years the number of German emigrants continuously. The main reason is the bad situation in the labor market, that government regulation thereof, and the inability "karst" rigidities to overcome. It is however, the unemployment rate would fall! And increase the available jobs would. But: 155,000 surety saw this in 2006 not as and sought their perspective abroad. Actually, it's no wonder: All the problems have been discussed in economic and employment law field between 2000 and 2004 in the public remained completely unresolved . The current "boom" conceals that all these pending problems as before.
Part of the problem is certainly a mentality (in economic terms) that prevails in this country. Obviously wants the German workers to be taken after completion of training of teaching, and up to that of his professional career at an end work to be employed. Thus the myth. Herein also lies the problem. The rise of temporary work ernome shows essentially one thing: companies still shun the regulations, unpredictable financial risks and disadvantages associated with a "normal" solzialversicherungspfichtigen workplace.
Only in higher skilled occupations such as engineers, architects, etc. This is different, because the demand of enterprises is greater than supply at the (German) labor market. Meanwhile, there is such that the number of compulsory social insurance employment conditions fell to about 48% of the labor market is. This means that this "ideal" has become a model minority ... So not the rule! Nevertheless, in view of the public acted as if the social security work is the norm. Not at all.
What does all this mean? It means that the less promising than regulating the labor market means that companies create just not this requested jobs , but this deal, to be employed in a temporary employee. No wonder.
Prompts you in a discussion in the event of firing, with leftist panelists will throw reflex: "Let's not American" hire and fire 'mentality . This is the typical response. But this argument is as wrong as short-sighted. In the U.S. (the economic picture of many fine German) is such that less-skilled (not to use the concept of bad-qualified) should look at two or three jobs to cover the cost of living. Which I do not disagree. But: In Germany, the situation far differently: Even some people here work in two or three jobs. Only these are often highly educated people such as lawyers, students, economists, lawyers, etc. This shows the imbalance our system, in which also provides a good education just not for a safe workplace.
Employment protection and its impact
Now we have time to ask what lies behind the criticism of the dismissal of all. The basic question is: How and why is a job created? A job is created when the entrepreneur operating the additional Labor under the present market conditions assesses so that it is a More-to-earnings (ie return for the operation) provides. And this short term, but medium and long term. I want to tell everyone social dreamer clear that hardly any company has his work or his business, "in order to create a job." to create a job, is not an end ! This is probably in every country in this world like that, but politically it is not pronounced in Germany. But the guarantors must to know! Now it is important to under what conditions should be the creation of a workplace. This is - in Germany - the problem: not only the protection against dismissal, but even hänebüchene regulations in any respect, but also completely covered costs make this unattractive part in an international comparison. All too often forget workers that their gross wage cost to the employer once his employer's contribution to social funds, and thus to about 140% (of the employee's gross salary) are summed. Wants the worker to send a donation so financially (eg € 50 Net), so it costs operation loosely around € 110 Be honest: Who is the more aware?
What happens now if a small company a new, additional workers would like to adjust (AN)? The owner will first calculate how high the demand is, and make in relation to the cost of the new job. In addition, the economic outlook. We behave the market in three or four years? As the purchasing power of customers will be? In principle, the answer to this question depends solely on the "experience" and the speculation of the decision. A self-employed can not look beyond reasonable doubt (or predict) how market and purchasing power . Develop He can not even run on water. If the decision maker but to a positive decision (ie the new work "pays off" for the operation), there is an adjustment made. So far so great. What happens if the market situation deteriorated in a few years? Tax increase, purchasing power decreases, demand decreases. A social insurance work must be reduced because the costs do not cover more revenue. Now, does the protection against dismissal. Includes a section of the self of his farm, or even the whole operation, then the notice of termination possible. Does he have the work break down but only because of the worsening market situation, the worker will initiate a rule, a dismissal action . This car mechanism is held the self in recent years, often it has to create such a work, even though the work situation and job situation would have allowed this. If things go well, AN and AG agree to the court for a compensation payment that is based on the applicable tariff. Often these are about 50% monthly gross salary per year. Was an employee or five years for a monthly € 3,000 employees, could in our example Agreement on a compensation amount of € 7,500 are located. That's a lot of money for a small business. In other words: The government has created in labor Rahmenbedigungen in which imposes the risk of the real economy, the self indeed, other conditions may, however, almost any answer for themselves (income tax rate, employment protection laws, indirect taxes increased to fuel Grunsteuern, etc.)
geschähe What if the dismissal was lost? The reversal of the above example scenario shows that an operation could be much more responsive to increasing demand (and a job schäffer) would, if the hurdles this would be low. Let us return to the U.S. where workers are in constant awareness that may be the end of an employment relationship nevertheless a new opportunity . In many cases there is already around the corner, a new job, and life goes on. Is the average unemployment in the USA was just 4%. The willingness for flexible acceptance of reality is there are far greater.
Not so in Germany. This leads precisely to the fact that educated people no find entry into the workforce, and odd jobs need to stay afloat. In the U.S., well-educated people are paid first class favorite playing grounds, and find - her own support when they lose a job (z, B, through bankruptcy, age-related business task marrow change, etc.) - a new job quickly. Between workers and employers are much lower barriers and self-will encourage them to broaden their and exercise. On the other hand, few-qualified are paid less. Yes, this is so. And?
In Germany we hear every day 10 times the concept of "social justice" . On the other hand, is rarely spoken of "equal opportunity" . Therefore, I strongly suspect that the number of emigrants in 2007 will exceed 155 000 again .... This in a country that is facing major demographic upheavals. Go or stay (again)?
0 comments:
Post a Comment